I call it genocide all the time sweetheart. Care to try again?
Biden could stop his support tomorrow that’s not going to change congress. Who is the actual problem here. And that’s exactly my point. Thank you for proving it for me again. Oh and go check my post history I call genocide all the time. The fact that you thought this was some big dunk that you had finally gotten. Pretty hilarious. Also pretty immature but expected :-)
I said you were behaving like a juvenile / adolescent. Not a child. Which you are even here. If you aren’t actually that young and just behaving like you are. That’s a you problem kiddo.
I call it genocide all the time [demeaning pet name omitted].
Then call it a genocide right now. Say that the actions of Netanyahu that Biden supports are a genocide.
Biden could stop his support tomorrow that’s not going to change congress.
Congress didn’t force Biden to sell Netanyahu weapons for genocide. Congress didn’t force him to claim there was no genocide. Congress didn’t force him to go to bat for Netanyahu at the UN for so long.
Oh and go check my post history I call genocide all the time.
I checked. Three whole times in the past month, and two of those were denying that Biden supports Netanyahu’s genocide. We have different metrics for “all the time.”
I said you were behaving like a juvenile / adolescent. Not a child. Which you are even here. If you aren’t actually that young and just behaving like you are. That’s a you problem kiddo.
Condescension is what centrists use as their replacement for defensible positions.
Condescension is what centrists use as their replacement for defensible positions.
Then you must be a centrist by your own weird metric because all you ever do is be condescending. And no, before you go accusing me, it’s not a lie. Look at your own post history.
“Biden should stop supporting genocide” is a defensible position. I notice that my interlocutor ceased when challenged to call Netanyahu’s actions the genocide they are.
I call it genocide all the time sweetheart. Care to try again?
Biden could stop his support tomorrow that’s not going to change congress. Who is the actual problem here. And that’s exactly my point. Thank you for proving it for me again. Oh and go check my post history I call genocide all the time. The fact that you thought this was some big dunk that you had finally gotten. Pretty hilarious. Also pretty immature but expected :-)
I said you were behaving like a juvenile / adolescent. Not a child. Which you are even here. If you aren’t actually that young and just behaving like you are. That’s a you problem kiddo.
Then call it a genocide right now. Say that the actions of Netanyahu that Biden supports are a genocide.
Congress didn’t force Biden to sell Netanyahu weapons for genocide. Congress didn’t force him to claim there was no genocide. Congress didn’t force him to go to bat for Netanyahu at the UN for so long.
I checked. Three whole times in the past month, and two of those were denying that Biden supports Netanyahu’s genocide. We have different metrics for “all the time.”
Condescension is what centrists use as their replacement for defensible positions.
Then you must be a centrist by your own weird metric because all you ever do is be condescending. And no, before you go accusing me, it’s not a lie. Look at your own post history.
“Biden should stop supporting genocide” is a defensible position. I notice that my interlocutor ceased when challenged to call Netanyahu’s actions the genocide they are.
Can you call it the genocide it is?
Again, condescending.
You refuse to call it a genocide. Noted.
Why would I answer a question coming from someone who isn’t arguing in good faith? And I can give a rats ass about what you keep “noted”, champ.
Removed by mod
And here comes the victimization.
🙄
Go back and read my previous reply.
your accusation of bad faith is, itself, bad faith