• archomrade [he/him]OPEnglish
    13•4 months ago

    I’ll vote for harm reduction if it comes down to it but if democrats want an endorsement they’ll have to do more than what they’re doing now.

    I’m not obligated to encourage anyone to vote for the lesser evil so long as the lesser evil still has an opportunity to be less evil.

      • @[email protected]
        13•4 months ago

        Wow. Literally saying the quiet part out loud - “Some random bullshit I just made up that hardly resembles what you said”

      • archomrade [he/him]OPEnglish
        11•4 months ago

        it’s okay to endorse inaction

        What part of my comment was an endorsement of inaction?

              • archomrade [he/him]OPEnglish
                11•4 months ago

                Oh, when there are only two possible choices

                Actually in this context there’s at least 4:

                • vote for a candidate AND endorse voting for the candidate
                • don’t vote for a candidate AND don’t endorse voting for the candidate
                • vote for a candidate AND don’t endorse voting for the candidate
                • don’t vote for a candidate AND endorse voting for the candidate

                Nobody has actually ‘voted’ for a candidate yet, all anyone has done thus far is endorse or not endorse voting for a candidate. Just as a reminder:

                I’ll vote for harm reduction if it comes down to it

                • @[email protected]
                  1•4 months ago

                  Only because of the electoral college you’re entirely wrong here.

                  There are only two choices.

                  1. Biden gets to 270 ec votes
                  2. He doesn’t and trump is appointed by Congress or gets to 270

                  There is no other option in the long run.

      • Nougat
        6•4 months ago

        Democrats have to be perfect. Republicans just have to be on the ballot.