• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    15 months ago

    Excellent example of what I mean. In a burning building panic isn’t helpful and hinders the actual correct response, just like with climate change.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      that’s not true. in a burning building, freaking out and getting the fuck out of the building is smart and why it’s instinctual

      sitting around and debating the best way to proceed is stupid AF

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        that’s not true. in a burning building, freaking out and getting the fuck out of the building is smart and why it’s instinctual

        Not at all, why do you think during fire drills you’re instructed to stay calm?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          They say that when there are large number of people and a risk of people being trampled or when there are young students and teachers need to keep count to make sure everyone gets out.

          At this point, the risk of every person on earth dying due to inaction or calmly discussing small ways to change is much higher than if everyone panics. People should have panicked 50 years ago when they looked at data.

          But go ahead, have calm rational discussions about policy decisions that can reduce exponential growth of destructive forces by 30 percent. Because nothing stops exponential growth like mild decreases in the rate of change.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            25 months ago

            It’s not about policy but about economics. Solar is growing exponentially and will soon be our cheapest source of energy, even so cheap that it will be cheaper to make carbon hydrates from the air than pump up fossil fuels.