• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      133 months ago

      There are industrial accidents, like fossil fuel plants catching fire and/or exploding, with more casualties than every nuclear ‘disaster’ combined.

        • @aubeynarf
          link
          3
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          .you just can’t get around needing consistent base load capacity. I wonder if the cost of a few GWh of batteries or complicated pumped dam/lake systems is reported in solar/wind figures to make an apples-to-apples comparison.

          maybe once we have a huge fleet of plugged in EV‘s serving as battery storage, variable sources will make sense as primary generation

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      73 months ago

      I’ll be the one to point out that TMI is exactly what you want to happen in a “nuclear disaster”. Nobody got seriously hurt that we know of, the problem was found and dealt with quickly once identified, and we’ve implemented TONS of extra safeties to make sure that can’t happen again without massive alarms and Serious Lights. Could it have not happened at all? Absolutely. But in a disaster, it’s the perfect “disaster” - nobody died, nobody got seriously injured directly, the plant got screwed up, and $2b to clean up ANY disaster site is honestly pretty damn cheap when we’re talking radioactive heavy metal remediation.

      • @aubeynarf
        link
        4
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The BP Deepwater Horizon spill cost like $60B to clean up, so even with inflation $2B is comparatively small.