@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 13 days agoElseviermander.xyzmessage-square150fedilinkarrow-up1966
arrow-up1966imageElseviermander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 13 days agomessage-square150fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•12 days agoWhen is why you steghide random data to the image to fuck up the other end =]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•12 days agoUnless you know specifically what they’re adding or changing this wouldn’t work. If they have a hidden ‘barcode’ and you add another hidden ‘barcode’ or modify the image in a way to remove some or all of theirs, they’d still be able to read theirs.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•12 days agoyeah, youd have to sample other downloads to collect statistics and unsteghide theirs to effectively ensure your fuzzing worked
When is why you steghide random data to the image to fuck up the other end =]
Unless you know specifically what they’re adding or changing this wouldn’t work. If they have a hidden ‘barcode’ and you add another hidden ‘barcode’ or modify the image in a way to remove some or all of theirs, they’d still be able to read theirs.
yeah, youd have to sample other downloads to collect statistics and unsteghide theirs to effectively ensure your fuzzing worked