I don’t know what a .webp file is but I don’t like it. They’re like a filthy prank version of the image/gif you’re looking for. They make you jump through all these hoops to find the original versions of the files that you can actually do anything with.

Edit: honestly I assumed it had something to do with Google protecting themselves from image piracy shit

  • qaz
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    It supports features such as lossless editing and transparency but the compression is pretty bad.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      It’s lossless, it’s meant for 2D and drawn graphics. Can’t do that much with lossless compression.

      • nulldev
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s still bad compared to modern lossless algorithms. PNG is very old and even though PNG encoders have evolved, it is still fundamentally a decade behind modern lossless compression algorithms.

        For example: JPEG XL in lossless mode compresses at least 30% better than PNG.

        Also, PNG is not actually lossless in many cases. PNG only supports RGB colorspaces. If you try to store anything that’s not in an RGB colorspace (e.g. a frame of a video) in a PNG, you will lose some color information as colorspace conversion is not lossless. Example of someone running into this issue: https://stackoverflow.com/q/35399677

        JPEG XL supports non-RGB colorspaces so you don’t have this problem.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Okay but that difference is not as critical as with jpg, which are also more abundant. The bigger problem with png is that people use it for things it’s not meant or designed for - frame of a video being case in point.

          If anything, it just proves how lacking we are in other image formats, when we keep shoehorning clipart formats like png and gif into other duties. Well not lacking as in not having them, but not using them.

          • nulldev
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            There’s no real reason why you shouldn’t use PNG for a frame of video. I’m not talking about using it as a video format, I’m talking about extracting a frame from a video and sending it off to an editor for inclusion in another video or image.

            As a user, I would expect that I could use the most popular lossless image format if I want to losslessly share a frame from a movie with someone.

            Of course I do agree that we need adoption of other image formats. We really should not still be cramming everything in PNGs or JPGs in 2023.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              There is, exactly because png is made for strict rgb colorspace. Especially today when videos can be in HDR and with all kinds of color correction shenanigans, so which you won’t get back once you try to put the PNG back into the video.

              But I’m not a video editor, so I don’t know what still format is best suited for this. I imagine real editors can deal with it, and for regular people who just make screenshots for memes, it’s good enough. As I said, png is still a good enough format, but let’s not use it for stuff like converting webp photos for further sharing.

              • nulldev
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                I think we generally agree but I just want to clarify anyways. I’m not saying we should use PNG to store frames from videos.

                What I am saying however, is that we should replace PNG with a modern lossless image format that is more flexible so users don’t have to deal with these issues. All this colorspace stuff should be automatically handled and I shouldn’t have to worry about it not being lossless. If I want to save a frame of video, I should be able to do it using an image format that everybody recognizes and accepts, it should not be a huge hassle and it should be fully lossless.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  Yes. The problem is getting developers/companies to support anything beyond than just the basics. There’s enough formats that could work, but if the big players only support these formats, everything else is secondary. Just like many music players still play only mp3.

    • Shurimal
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      PNG compresses like nothing else when it comes to graphs, text, UI elements, digital drawings, comics, screenshots from apps etc. And doesn’t suffer from “mosquito” artifacts and other .jpg nonsense. It was never meant to be used for photographs and other statistically “noisy” images for which .jpg works much better.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Isn’t it funny how the internet is full of Instagram screenshots in PNG, and Twitter screenshots in JPG?

        It feels like some extra-dimensional aliens are fucking with us and making everything backwards.