@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agoIrrationalmander.xyzmessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up1297
arrow-up1297imageIrrationalmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square55fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•3 months agoIf you have three particles, 1/3 of that is one particle. No need to divide an indivisible particle.
minus-squarethemeatbridgelinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoBut if I don’t have three particles, 1/3 requires division.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•3 months agoRight, but you can have exactly a third of some group of particles. You can’t have exactly pi of some group of particles I think is what they were saying
If you have three particles, 1/3 of that is one particle. No need to divide an indivisible particle.
But if I don’t have three particles, 1/3 requires division.
Right, but you can have exactly a third of some group of particles. You can’t have exactly pi of some group of particles I think is what they were saying