• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There is always room for pathological science. Especially when something like room temperature superconductors are the subject in question. A good researcher will try to find and test all the alternative hypotheses that they can. i.e contrast the cisplatin paper with fleischmann and pons’ paper about cold fusion. This paper reminds me a lot more of the cold fusion paper than it does the cisplatin paper. Another example of a bad paper would be NASA’s announcement of a microbe that used an Arsenic containing analog of DNA.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m not excluding the possibility of fraud, but the fraud would have to be deliberate, not self delusion.