@[email protected] to Political [email protected]English • 5 months agoAh Bernie, what could have been...lemmy.mlmessage-square247fedilinkarrow-up11.26K
arrow-up11.26KimageAh Bernie, what could have been...lemmy.ml@[email protected] to Political [email protected]English • 5 months agomessage-square247fedilink
minus-squareBarqsHasBitelinkfedilink3•edit-25 months agoJFC I don’t know how you misread things so badly. Go read from the very start
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•edit-25 months ago She did lose because she moved a little bit left and the voters did not show up. We’re saying you don’t understand cause and effect. You are saying A (moving left) caused B (losing). If A didn’t happen, then B also would not have happened. Therefore, “if she had stayed to the right, she would have won.” Edit: I think I figured out what I’ve got wrong. If I rephrase what you said, then it makes more sense: “She did lose because the voters did not show up, even though she moved a little left.”
JFC I don’t know how you misread things so badly. Go read from the very start
We’re saying you don’t understand cause and effect.You are saying A (moving left) caused B (losing).If A didn’t happen, then B also would not have happened. Therefore, “if she had stayed to the right, she would have won.”Edit: I think I figured out what I’ve got wrong. If I rephrase what you said, then it makes more sense:
“She did lose because the voters did not show up, even though she moved a little left.”
deleted by creator