• queermunist she/her
    link
    fedilink
    55 months ago

    He is not a legitimate candidate for president.

    He already cast his vote. Answer my question: did he vote for genocide?

    The primaries are over, pick trump or Biden. You get nothin else. Any ideological opinion on the value of voting or nonvoting ( moral or systemic) are moot, as the system is already constrained to 2 outcomes.

    This is not an ideological choice and this is not frivolous moralism. This is strategic.

    If Biden understood that he will lose if he doesn’t end the genocide then he will do anything he has to do in order to stay in power because he’s a politician. It’s plainly obvious that we have already pushed him on this issue and if we stay the course we can force him to capitulate to our demands. The only reason Biden has not already ended his support for the genocide is because of you blue-no-matter-whos doing everything you can to convince his team that he can have his genocidal cake and eat it too.

    If we were actually fucking united on this issue he would fold like wet cardboard! If his rallies were filled with protesters instead of blue-no-matter-whos chanting “four more years!” he would understand. He’s not a demon. He’s a politician.

    You stopped the uncommitted movement from succeeding. You stopped the campus protests from succeeding. Your fault.

    By refusing to stand with us all you are doing is ensuring the genocide will continue, either under Biden or under Trump.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Meh, you (and I) are in a constrained system. Any other words on choice are fluff.

      You’re ascribing emotions to something that has none. You’re ascribing motive to someone you dont even know.

      Thus far edit ive only declared I don’t want trump president. You don’t know my choices beyond that.

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I don’t want Trump president either, but if Biden does not stop he is going to lose.

        And so I have to use the only leverage I have to force Biden to stop supporting and carrying out genocide. If anti-Trump voters actually want to stop Trump then y’all need to understand that Trump is going to win because of the genocide. The people who don’t support genocide will not vote for Biden and the people who love genocide will vote for Trump, it’s lose lose.

        We have to force Biden to move on this issue or he’s doomed. It’s not about anyone’s feelings or emotions or what you truly want in your heart. Like I said, this is strategic. We are in a constrained system, this is the only strategy we have.

        Or is your plan to help Biden win just to scream at people who won’t vote for genocide?

        Because that’s doomed to fail. This is what you are voting for.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            35 months ago

            But, I think Netanyahu actively wants Trump in power, and I don’t think Biden has the power or ability to really do anything to stop him.

            I don’t think he has the willingness to stop selling weapons to Netanyahu.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      25 months ago

      If we were actually fucking united on this issue he would fold like wet cardboard! If his rallies were filled with protesters instead of blue-no-matter-whos chanting “four more years!” he would understand. He’s not a demon. He’s a politician.

      This is just naive. Protesting against Biden’s Middle East policies is basically kids threatening to run away from home if their parents don’t buy them what they want.

      Of course Biden is never going to say this because, again, he’s a politician and has a public image to keep, but he could literally reply to said protestors “Or else? You gonna let Trump win and do worse? Yeah right, now shut up and vote for me”, and they would have absolutely nothing to answer.

      That’s how two-party systems work. You identify the worse outcome and vote for the other one. The only way to force the second-worst party to get better is to force the actual worst one to do it first.

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Protesting against Biden’s Middle East policies is basically kids threatening to run away from home if their parents don’t buy them what they want.

        They’re grown adults choosing to be violently beaten by cops and vigilantes for their beliefs. Have some fucking respect.

        Of course Biden is never going to say this because, again, he’s a politician and has a public image to keep, but he could literally reply to said protestors “Or else? You gonna let Trump win and do worse? Yeah right, now shut up and vote for me”, and they would have absolutely nothing to answer.

        You’re contradicting yourself.

        He’s a politician and has a public image to keep because he can’t just say shit like that, because he’s not actually invincible. Your cynicism is understandable, you’ve convinced yourself there’s nothing you can do so the guilt doesn’t eat you alive, but the truth is that Biden is vulnerable to public image because he still wants to be reelected. If he really believed that he was going to lose because of his support for genocide then he would change his policies. He can be pushed. You refuse to try because you’re scared.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          25 months ago

          Where am I contradicting myself exactly? He has a public image to keep, so he can’t openly say that. But he very much can act accordingly anyway, and that’s what he’s doing. Because he knows we have no viable alternative and anyone who seriously cares about minimizing casualties (so apparently not you) will not risk Trump getting reelected over some moral superiority that means nothing. He’s never going to lose over his support for genocide because you literally can’t vote against it. That’s how two-party systems work, period. The only reasons he can possibly lose over are differences between his agenda and his opponent’s, and genocide is unfortunately not one of those.

          You’re the one trying to avoid guilt so that when a genocide-enabling candidate inevitably gets elected you can say to yourself “well at least I didn’t vote for them!”.