(⬤ᴥ⬤) to [email protected] • 5 months agoGNU-Linuxlemmy.blahaj.zonemessage-square235fedilinkarrow-up11.72K
arrow-up11.72KimageGNU-Linuxlemmy.blahaj.zone(⬤ᴥ⬤) to [email protected] • 5 months agomessage-square235fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish57•5 months agoWho’s obsessed? It’s a joke about a dude attempting to man-splain even when they’re wrong (I’m a dude and I’ve definitely seen it) and her turning the tables on him. That’s it. To get defensive about that is… weird.
minus-squareRichardlinkfedilinkEnglish11•5 months agoMore like the author is so insecure herself that she feels forced to use these terms in the belief that they somehow strengthen her position.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish46•5 months agoYep, this is more of the weird defensive attitude. Thanks for another example.
minus-squareTurboWafflzlinkfedilink32•5 months agoOr… Just maybe… It’s a joke and it’s just trying to be an even more absurd take on the original gnu+linux copypasta
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•5 months agoQuite right. The joke works even without the „woman good/man bad“ subtext.
Who’s obsessed? It’s a joke about a dude attempting to man-splain even when they’re wrong (I’m a dude and I’ve definitely seen it) and her turning the tables on him. That’s it. To get defensive about that is… weird.
More like the author is so insecure herself that she feels forced to use these terms in the belief that they somehow strengthen her position.
Yep, this is more of the weird defensive attitude. Thanks for another example.
Or… Just maybe… It’s a joke and it’s just trying to be an even more absurd take on the original gnu+linux copypasta
Removed by mod
No, that’s me.
Quite right. The joke works even without the „woman good/man bad“ subtext.