@[email protected] to Political [email protected]English • 9 days agoWe poor Americans could NEVER understand such a complex conceptlemmy.worldmessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1461
arrow-up1461imageWe poor Americans could NEVER understand such a complex conceptlemmy.world@[email protected] to Political [email protected]English • 9 days agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink18•9 days agoI’d argue that you don’t really need empirical data for that, since game theory already proves that’s the case.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•9 days agoI don’t disagree at all, but if you want to actually change things, actual examples are way more convincing than a logical proof with no data.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•8 days agoCompletely different categories, homie. Also, the bible doesn’t even claim to do so.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•8 days agothen your categories are too small. both are modes of thought
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•edit-28 days agoThe Bible is a mode of thought? O.o Also, again: the bible never claims to prove god. Also, game theory is a scientific field with provable theorems and theses. Not the same cathegory as a religious text.
I’d argue that you don’t really need empirical data for that, since game theory already proves that’s the case.
I don’t disagree at all, but if you want to actually change things, actual examples are way more convincing than a logical proof with no data.
and the bible “proves” god exists
Completely different categories, homie. Also, the bible doesn’t even claim to do so.
then your categories are too small. both are modes of thought
The Bible is a mode of thought? O.o Also, again: the bible never claims to prove god.
Also, game theory is a scientific field with provable theorems and theses. Not the same cathegory as a religious text.