• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    163 months ago

    They did, in 2016, and he lost because America is too far gone and doesn’t have time to recover before we burn the world.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      303 months ago

      They absolutely did not. They resisted him every step of the way, especially in 2016.

      And so we never got to see how he would have fared against a Republican.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        63 months ago

        Oh come on. We had a spell in the UK with a leftist candidate, and we ate him alive. We’re considerably less right-wing than the US, so there’s no fucking way that voters would’ve voted for Sanders.

        You get the politicians you deserve.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          123 months ago

          Bernie Sanders is a centrist by UK standards, though. At least one analysis of the vote totals found that he would’ve won the electoral college count, at least based on the voters who say they would’ve voted for him or Trump.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            33 months ago

            It’s easy to say anything to a survey that comes to you. It’s about the reality of how many would actually go out and miss some work to vote for the guy.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              33 months ago

              Perhaps. My point is not that Sanders definitely would have won, but that his winning was absolutely a plausible outcome. Heck, I know two Sanders-Trump voters, so I know at least that they exist.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          53 months ago

          Are you referring to Corbyn being ruined by the Israeli lobby? Remind me was that before or after Brexit?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            13 months ago

            It wasn’t just that, though. While I liked Corbyn, his ideological leaning meant that he would be incredibly easy to trip up on practically anything, from Brexit to the royals to the IRA.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              13 months ago

              What does that even mean?

              He wasn’t deserving of support because he had an opposition?

              Now he’s out and there’s a centrist happy to be a Tory.

              How is that working out? Free of trip ups?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                What the fuck are you on about?

                I don’t particularly like Starmer, but he’s likely going to be the last Labour leader since the last faux-Tory, and likely going to win the largest majority for decades.

                It’s going to work out really well for him, and that’s likely because the UK is far more right-leaning than we’d like to admit. Still, we’re absolutely nowhere near the US…

                I’m surprised that this is even in question. Even Reddit gets this…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            13 months ago

            They did, but you’d be a fool to think that he was electable to most of the UK population. Besides, basically every leader since Starmer and Blair have been fucked over by the media.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 months ago

              I’d contend that the public never got the chance to decide. If you think your options are the people you know or a raging antisemite, it’s not much of a choice

    • Cowbee [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      103 months ago

      America was always too far gone, any good candidate would’ve gotten Allende’d.