I know this might be a couple months old, but I didn’t know we already passed 4%.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    45 months ago

    I gave up on Homebrew because it was difficult to install.

    It just includes as a dependency the Mac command line developer tools, which can be installed pretty easily from what I remember.

    And what I like is that it’s a normal Unix style shell, with almost all the utilities you’d expect.

    you have to drag the icon in to install things.

    I mean that’s about 100 times better than Windows’ default of running an installer that isn’t easily reversible.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      On Linux I don’t drag icons nor download random shit from my web browser, there’s a software center (which I control), and I click install, and then the software is there.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        Yes, software that is in a package manager is similarly easy on a Mac. There’s an app store, which can be used to install the dependencies for homebrew (which is a good package manager for most of the stuff that Linux package managers maintain, including building stuff from source). Going outside of a package manager is relatively easy (but needs to be enabled, as the defaults basically discourage users from installing software not verified by Apple), but that method of software installation still beats running .exe/.msi installers downloaded from the internet, beats running random shell scripts, probably beats downloading docker containers and flatpaks, and is not that far removed from installing from the AUR or something like pip/conda: you still need to know what you’re doing, and you have to trust the source/maintainer. None of that is unique to any operating system, except those that simply don’t allow you to install software not reviewed/approved by the manufacturer (Apple mobile devices, Android devices by default).