The foundational 1984 decision required courts to defer to agencies’ reasonable interpretations of ambiguous statutes, underpinning regulations on health care, safety and the environment.

This is what the decision by the Republican justices to allow “gratuities” for public officials creates an incentive for.

  • @[email protected]
    38•4 months ago

    Does no one else see that Clarence Thomas (who has been accused [with proof] that he took millions in “gifts”) is sitting on a court that just overturned a rule the would hold him accountable to receiving those gifts?

    What the actual fuck?

    • KNova
      11•4 months ago

      Yeah we see it but we are talking about a different thing here