@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agoCursed wretched marketingmander.xyzmessage-square127fedilinkarrow-up1962
arrow-up1962imageCursed wretched marketingmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square127fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoYou disputed that right here: It’s not accurate to say we were all looking at the same image with the dress. Why would you bring this up if not because of my comment?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-23 months agoI’m saying I didn’t dispute the optical illusions/visual fuckery occurring. That’s not incompatible with the other contributing factors I listed. Does that make sense?
You disputed that right here:
Why would you bring this up if not because of my comment?
I’m saying I didn’t dispute the optical illusions/visual fuckery occurring. That’s not incompatible with the other contributing factors I listed. Does that make sense?