• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    755 months ago

    Let’s be honest, very few people who talk about how much they hate Microsoft will even consider alternatives

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I didn’t notice or care about their comment, it was meaningless bs. Yours is something for which it’s feasible to provide evidence, it’s a novel claim, and I saw nothing to back it up other than hostility.

            That the switch to linux has a lot of friction? That it’s difficult?

            Everyone mostly agrees on this, not interesting. Also you didn’t even directly claim this in your post, so obviously I wasn’t asking about this. You’re just seemingly using this hostile badgering approach to stifle the conversation.

            That Microsoft has deliberately cultivated that friction?

            This is the interesting claim. After all Linux deliberately shoots its legs off every few years, why does Microsoft need to help?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      145 months ago

      Yes, because I need Adobe to do my meh wage part-time job in developing country from my one and only working laptop and I don’t have the luxury of surplus money, time, and mental energy to do anything about it.

      But I get your point. If I have the means, I will fix my broken Thinkpad and definitely install Linux there the first chance I get. Either that or Adobe finally release Linux version, which will probably be released after Half-Life 3.

      I can’t wait to try Endeavor (so I can finally be an obnoxious person who say “I used Arch-based distro, btw”)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Either that or Adobe finally release Linux version, which will probably be released after Half-Life 3.

        Yeah, I’ve seen what Adobe’s support looks like. I remember the Linux version of Flash Player. The guy in charge of it whined on the official Adobe blog on the subject that he had to support “minority browsers” which at the time was everything but Internet Explorer on Windows.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        That’s my point exactly, Linux doesn’t come without sacrifice and few are willing to sacrifice anything for freedom

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          Adobe products barely work correctly on Windows, I wouldn’t want to try to run them in an environment that was even less supported

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            Honestly that would make me want to run them in wine more. Wine environments can be controlled a lot easier than a Windows install can be.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                25 months ago

                What I am saying is that if Illustrator breaks on Windows, you might have to reinstall Windows. If it breaks on Linux, you just reinstall in a new wine prefix, or restore from a backup or snapshot. The rest of the system remains unaffected. Does that make sense?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  25 months ago

                  Not really. If illustrator breaks on Windows at the most I’ll have to power cycle the PC. I’ve never heard of it taking Windows down with it.

                  To even get it functional on wine I’d have to invest untold hours of research and tomfoolery, and then any time it didn’t work I’d not know if it was adobe’s fault or wine’s.

                  I wouldn’t mind doing this kind of thing for a hobby, but not for production software unfortunately.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      125 months ago

      I used to help maintain a Linux distro, and there is a level of polish Windows has that I feel cannot be reached by the FOSS ecosystem due the resources dumped into hiring dedicated teams at MS. Microsoft has tons of money. I’m sad about the direction of windows, but it generally works pretty well for how it’s designed (which is in some cases awful).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        85 months ago

        there was a time where that may have been the case, but microsoft has been chipping away at any polish they had for years. sure there’s still some rough edges in linux, but it’s only getting better where windows continues to get worse

      • cheesepotatoes
        link
        fedilink
        English
        55 months ago

        I agree with your point, but I never would have thought of describing Windows as “polished”.

          • cheesepotatoes
            link
            fedilink
            English
            9
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Sure. I could accept hearing “Windows is more polished than most Linux distro’s”. But to say blankly that Windows is polished is crazy talk. It’s jank as balls. Its got like 3 totally discrete and independent UI frameworks for the menus operating in parallel, and somehow none of them provide all the functionality you would need, have to mix and match them.

            That’s just a single example. I could rant for hours.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        I’m sad about the direction of windows, but it generally works pretty well for how it’s designed

        That is a bold claim. And absolutely wrong for many configurations.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        A good amount of Linux distros don’t seem to want to get the basics down. Constant churn vs stable but way out of date is more how is describe the choice, while windows at it’s core is actually a pretty stable platform. I don’t have to, for example, get annoyed at Firefox middle mouse scroll not working because I forgot this distro still defaults to x11 even though it installs Wayland too blah blah blah.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      105 months ago

      Most people believe they will start seeing problems where there were none before. They need to invest time into research about their use-cases, which is a cost even before switching.

      The typical user used Windows since before they became scared of change, so that’s what they’ll stick with.

      The pain of using Windows still can and will be higher without the majority of people switching to anything.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45 months ago

          I don’t want to point fingers/cast shade or anything. Hell, I myself resist change where I can.

          It costs incredible amounts of energy and time to change, and that change might even be counter productive to some or most of the things you do.

          Gratulations on starting Linux, I hope it does everything you need it to do. Even if you should end up using it only for a short amount of time, I hope the experience enriches you.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      I’m not allowed to do my full-time job from any other computer besides the windows one assigned to me.