• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    356 months ago

    Why would copyright ever drive culture? The only thing it’s designed to do is drive profits.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      276 months ago

      Well in theory the idea is that it encourages people to create more by making doing so more lucrative. May have even made some sense back in the era before digitization.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        186 months ago

        I could see that working for the relative short term, but the renewal of what should be public domain copyrights is pretty insane.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          126 months ago

          Yeah even if you are pro-copyright as a way to encourage artistic creation there is no justification for how insanely long works stay under copyright. Or for banning free filesharing of copyrighted works.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            106 months ago

            I haven’t ment anyone who supports a post life of the author copyright protection yet. IMO ~20-30 years seems solid. Enough time to express your ideas and elaborate on them, but short enough where authors will be driven to make more than one IP. That’s also more inline with what it used to be.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Right, copyright was meant to give a profit incentive to creators, but the effectively infinite copyright we have now mainly gives profit incentive to large companies who can horde creative works, like Paramount+ in the above case.

            It’s breaking the original compact where we give temporary exclusivity at the reward of more creation. Now it’s effectively permanent exclusivity, with creativity locked up by which obese monster can sit on the biggest hoard of treasure

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          36 months ago

          But if copyright didn’t generate profit for 3-4 generations how will my grandchildren buy yachts?!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        36 months ago

        I don’t know about theory, more of the retrocon. If it was really there to encourage innovation we would have ironclad caselaw that prevented any artist from not getting properly paid. I take your meaning however.