• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    105 months ago

    “your proposal would harm young artists who need to share their works in order to gain publicity for something they intend to sell and sustain themselves on.”

    The default is already for young artists to share a lot of their work hoping to get noticed. Getting rid of copyright would be reorienting the whole system to center that experience more rather than the established artists and art producing corporations who now are in a strong enough position to charge. “Making it” would just mean that your patreon was doing gangbusters rather than selling a lot of copies of whatever your art is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      No, it would empower anybody, especially corporations, to take the new artists’ ideas and work and repackage them as an item for sale to others. Anything you share would not be covered by copyright and therefor no longer be your property.

      Individuals cannot compete with organizations.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        75 months ago

        If you are already sharing something for free in order to gain publicity, what is the downside of others repackaging them and spreading them further? That is exactly the kind of publicity you’re trying to gain.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          But you’re not profiting off of it. The corporation is. They have no incentive to give you credit, every incentive to claim that they made it which they would of course be allowed to do. They could even start making their own derivative pieces or continuations. The artist has gained nothing from this hypothetical.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            45 months ago

            Eliminating copyright doesn’t mean they’d be allowed to lie about who wrote what they were publishing. Anything an artist creates blowing up and gaining wide appreciation is very good for that artist’s future prospects. An artist who is spreading their work for free anyway is much better off in the scenario where there’s no copyright and everyone understands the need to tip / patronize their favorite artists.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Eliminating copyright doesn’t mean they’d be allowed to lie about who wrote what they were publishing.

              That is literally what Copyright is. Removing it means exactly that.

              • @[email protected]OP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                55 months ago

                No copyright is about the “right” to “copy” the work in question, not the attribution. Works that are in the public domain still list the author.