• DebatableRaccoon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    125 months ago

    You’re right, broader compatibility and being more user-friendly serves no use to anyone

    • Jack Riddle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      145 months ago

      Linux is compatible with almost all windows software now, and windows is absolutely not more user friendly, it’s just what you’re used to.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Install windows software: download the exe or msi and click OK 2 or 3 times

        Install Linux software: you got at least 40hrs to learn terminal commands to install dependencies n shit? I fucking don’t, that’s not what user-friendly looks like to 90% of the planet

        • Jack Riddle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          135 months ago

          It’s clear you haven’t used linux.

          Windows: open edge, go to google, type the package you want, scroll past ads, download random executable from internet, execute, click through wizard, open program.

          Linux: open package manager, search package you want, click install, open program.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            65 months ago

            I have, quite a bit: Ubuntu, Red Hat, Mint, Debian. Not everything is in your precious package manager

          • Fonzie!
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            And once you’ve done it once, you can install it again on another machine by just using

            Linux: $PACKAGE_MANAGER install $PACKAGE, open program.

            Windows: open edge, go to google, type the package you want, scroll past ads, download random executable from internet, execute, click through wizard, open program.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          85 months ago

          Pretty much everything is available in a package manager, flatpaks, etc.

          If you’re at the point of building from source, I don’t think you’re in regular user territory to start with.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          05 months ago

          commands to install dependencies n shit

          That only happens if you are fixated on installing the software without connecting to the internet.
          Otherwise, the package manager does it for you (that’s what its job is)

      • DebatableRaccoon
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 months ago

        I guess some of us are more astute when it comes to the difference between clicking something and needing to open a terminal and remember strings of commands before. Oh, and being intrinsically familiar with a forum.

        • Jack Riddle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          For a lot of distro’s you don’t need to use a terminal to install things if you aren’t comfortable with that. While I believe learning to use a commandline a little bit will always be beneficial, you really don’t havo to. Take a look at linux mint for example, which has a “store” for packages.

          • DebatableRaccoon
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            When I used Mint, I found I’d typically get outdated versions when downloading software from the “store”, sometimes to the extent that it outright wouldn’t work. It was because of that I found myself needing to learn to use Terminal.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      Thought you were talking about Linux at first.

      I use both Windows, Linux, and macOS - my opinion is that Windows is the least user-friendly of the bunch.