A BBC investigation reveals that Microsoft is permanently banning Palestinians in the U.S. and other countries who use Skype to call relatives in Gaza.

  • bbbbbbbbbbb
    link
    fedilink
    724 months ago

    You have to trust someone with these communications, there is no free communication beyond face to face

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      354 months ago

      Matrix (federated) or Briar (multi-modal P2P) are both good options for getting rid of dependency on central organizations.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          114 months ago

          They didn’t fuck up, they made a design choice about the scope of the app. Are they also fucking up by not blurring the messages on screen? After all someone could be looking over your shoulder without you realizing it. Maybe Signal should ship with spyglasses.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            84 months ago

            You’re absolutely right and it’s insane I keep coming across these wild takes from people that clearly don’t understand technology

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            54 months ago

            I’m not sure why you think anyone would want a messenger that touts itself for its encryption to not encrypt things.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                fedilink
                24 months ago

                Then it’s weird they are fixing it now. Why aren’t they insisting this doesn’t need to be dealt with because it was a feature, not a bug?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  64 months ago

                  It’s weird that apps sometimes change scope and add features that users want? Ones that contributers already did most of the work for?

                  Why aren’t they insisting this doesn’t need to be dealt with because it was a feature, not a bug?

                  That was literally what they have been saying this whole fucking time.

                  “The database key was never intended to be a secret. At-rest encryption is not something that Signal Desktop is currently trying to provide or has ever claimed to provide,” responded the Signal employee.

                  • Flying Squid
                    link
                    fedilink
                    14 months ago

                    Did they make an intentional design choice which users should have been okay with like you said the first time or is this a feature users wanted? It can’t be both.

                • subignition
                  link
                  fedilink
                  24 months ago

                  It’s really fucking annoying how relentlessly you pick fights with people these days. Wish you’d chill out dude.

                  • Flying Squid
                    link
                    fedilink
                    14 months ago

                    Or I’m just speaking my mind and you don’t agree.

                    And aren’t you picking as fight with me right now?

        • cum
          link
          fedilink
          English
          84 months ago

          Damn that’s bad, and Signal’s response was even worse. They knew about it in 2018, for 6 years.

          • sunzu
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            I always felt like signal is there more to satisfy a niche so people feel like their whatsapp is good enough.

            Leadership makes some odd chocies IMHO

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            44 months ago

            That wouldn’t shock me, but he was right that Signal was not addressing a known vulnerability. In fact, denying that it even was a vulnerability.

            For what it’s worth, I trust Telegram even less than Signal. And at least Signal seems to be finally doing something about the problem.

        • sunzu
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          Threema is what signal should have been.

          But I ain’t got in me to start forcing people again lol

          Signal it is until it is proven untrustworthy

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            34 months ago

            Yeah, they’re both good (still).

            features Threema Signal
            price $5 / 5€ Free
            account creation phone number optional phone number required
        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I was simply responding to the comment:

          You have to trust someone with these communications, there is no free communication beyond face to face

          the oh-so-clever smart alecks saying “whaddabout ISPs???” forgot about 2-way radio and meshnets

    • cum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      84 months ago

      Not true at all lol, have you heard of peer-to-peer?

    • Todd Bonzalez
      link
      fedilink
      24 months ago

      You can run your own infrastructure.

      Matrix has been recommended, but you can run your own Synapse server and federate with other servers.