@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-24 months agoGunshots reportedly fired at Donald Trump rally - as former president rushed off stagenews.sky.commessage-square547fedilinkarrow-up1856file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1856external-linkGunshots reportedly fired at Donald Trump rally - as former president rushed off stagenews.sky.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-24 months agomessage-square547fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•4 months ago I am also certain that I am correct. A sure way to know an unreliable source
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•4 months agoYes, I guess we will find out if you’re the world’s only legitimate soothsayer with an outcome you’ve predicted that has 50/50 odds of coming true.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•4 months agoThat’s not how odds work. The fact there are only two outcomes does not mean the odds of each of those outcomes occurring is the same…
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•4 months agoYes, the braindead thing you’re saying you can predict the future. As a remotely reasonable person, I dispute this laughable idea.
minus-squareLustyArgonianlinkfedilinkEnglish1•4 months agoLol exactly, no one knows the future. That’s the problem with inductive reasoning and the philosophical idea of the absurd.
A sure way to know an unreliable source
We’ll see won’t we?
Yes, I guess we will find out if you’re the world’s only legitimate soothsayer with an outcome you’ve predicted that has 50/50 odds of coming true.
That’s not how odds work. The fact there are only two outcomes does not mean the odds of each of those outcomes occurring is the same…
Yes, the braindead thing you’re saying you can predict the future. As a remotely reasonable person, I dispute this laughable idea.
Lol exactly, no one knows the future. That’s the problem with inductive reasoning and the philosophical idea of the absurd.