The Democratic Socialists of America pulled its endorsement of Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York this week, accusing the progressive congresswoman of being insufficiently supportive of the Palestinian cause and efforts to end the war in Gaza…

Her approach has increasingly strained her relationship with some of the left’s most strident critics of Israel. When she rallied last month in the Bronx with Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Jamaal Bowman, dozens of pro-Palestinian demonstrators angry over her endorsement of Mr. Biden chanted “You’re a fraud, A.O.C.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    40
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Good. No compromise on genocide. Never again means never again.

    This gives me some hope for the DSA.

    And don’t come at me with “pragmatism”. The pragmatists supported the Nazis.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        234 months ago

        “Ugh, genocide is bad, but we have other things to worry about right now.”

        — You, and most Germans during World War II.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          104 months ago

          genuine question, what alternative is there to voting for whatever candidate the democrats run with?

          • comfy
            link
            fedilink
            8
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Serious replies:

            • Developing alternate forms of power to ‘vote once every four years’. Now, I realize it’s probably not the answer you’re looking for as obviously that won’t just happen in time for this election, but it’s necessary to understand the material power we hold as workers in society, unless you’re actually happy with whatever candidates the Democrats run with. There have been times where worker action hindered genocidal regimes and wars by cutting off supply and pressuring our governments into pulling support.

            • Pressuring the Democrats away from running certain candidates

            • Somehow making a third-party popular enough to threaten your local seat [probably not feasible for most seats?]

            • Somehow abolishing the broken FPTP voting system [probably not feasible?]

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              64 months ago

              right but couldn’t you vote for the democrats and also do those things? it’s not really a one or the other kind of situation

              • comfy
                link
                fedilink
                24 months ago

                Definitely, and for most people (there are rare exceptions, like seats which aren’t just Dem vs. Rep as the only viable candidates) I’d assume it’s the pragmatic choice for now given the broken system.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              54 months ago

              Somehow abolishing the broken FPTP voting system [probably not feasible?]

              Not feasible? Then why do Alaska and Maine use something other then First Past The Post voting?

              How we vote is controlled at the state level, we can push through reform one state at a time!

              • comfy
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                My mistake, I heard about those but assumed it only applied for state-level politicians, not federal politicians they elect. Thanks for letting me know!

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        15
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The Ukraine war is a big source of actual leftie infighting. But DSA did not withdraw their endorsement on that. This is a strawman.

        Dems wanted lefties to compromise and they did. Then Dems want lefties to compromise some more.

        The Genocide in Gaza is not up to debate for any leftie. And Bernie and AOC have even promoted the Genocide at the start of it by refusing to call it a Genocide, and refusing to call for a ceasefire.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        74 months ago

        Source that they’re foreign assets?

        DSA is a membership-led and membership-funded organization, with the vast majority of our funding coming from membership dues. This guarantees that our resources come from our source of power: organized people. Our funding and our power are inextricably linked. Dues allow our organization to be accountable to our members and our members alone. source

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          34 months ago

          You could say the same exact thing about AIPAC. It’s also a membership-led and membership-funded organization where the vast majority of it’s funding coming from private donations… yet somehow I don’t think you’ll have the same reaction to them being foreign assets. The reality is that both of these organizations advance the interests of foreign governments over America’s, only difference is that Israel is a US ally and the countries that the DSA chooses to align itself with are American adversaries.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      84 months ago

      Never again means never again.

      That’s a good way to describe how the DSA views political power.