• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    64 months ago

    Not really, NATO as an organizational is made of of the military and equipment of all members. Also NATO and US bases are different, if the US pulls out it’s not taking NATO bases with it. Also I’m pretty sure the US doesn’t use NATO bases for its military operations but their own bases but I’m too lazy to look that up. Also also NATO countries defence strategy has been more like “If you attack one member you attack everyone” so no one really has.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      If you attack a NATO member, the largest military in the world responds. The US has multiple of the largest air forces if you count our military services separately. I would assume Trump pulling us from NATO would affect our forward bases, but we may do better than brexit I guess. I just don’t see it as likely. But, my point is that our independent and joint military ventures frees up nations with smaller GDPs to focus less on their own defense (even if they contribute more as a percentage) and it’s a situation the US military likes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        44 months ago

        I’m not so sure it would. Like, yea, the US has enough military to take on like the other top 5 militaries in the world and win but NATO doesn’t really need that. It’s mostly about defence and the only country currently invading countries in Europe is Russia which can’t seem to beat Ukraine alone. The biggest issue if the US pulls out is supporting Ukraine but defensively NATO is fine without the US I think.

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          NATO has nuclear second strike capabilities globally even without the US and that’s enough against overt military threats.

          We need to get better at this hybrid war bullshit bc that’s exactly what the US is falling to right now.