Jack Black has said he’s cancelled the rest of the Tenacious D world tour after his bandmate Kyle Gass sparked an outcry with a comment about the assassination attempt on Donald Trump.

The comedy rock group were on stage in Sydney, Australia, on Sunday when Gass was asked to make a wish after being presented with a cake for his 64th birthday.

He appeared to reply: “Don’t miss Trump next time.”

Gass also split with his agent following the incident.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      57
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I really doubt he torpedoed their careers. The joke was no worse than lots of jokes Trump has made, such as about Nancy Pelosi’s husband. If the partnership ends, it’s because of Jack Black, not because of people clamoring for them to stop touring.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          154 months ago

          Targets on their back while touring Australia, which has gun control? There are trump supporters and right wing nutjobs here but its a different political and legal atmosphere than america.

          He did this as he feared being canceled IMHO, more than fear for safety. If it was safety, they would say that. Likely there was already the start of a relationship breakdown. Or jack feared more for his movie career as he is likely lined on both sides of the political spectrum.

          First they came for the minstrels.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-05-25/perth-mother-and-daughter-killed-in-double-murder-suicide/103892146

            Turns out someone was recently shot in Perth. Looks like it is possible, even with WA’s new gun laws.

            Furthermore unless the world done shrank on me, a “world tour” I would surmise isn’t just exclusive to Aus and then they live there and never leave. Chances are at some point that tour (or y’know, going home) would bring them back to the states.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              34 months ago

              Yes, gun control is not no guns.

              If it was about riaj, they could cancel just the american part. Or would that increase the risk.

              Is cancellong the non USA parts appeasing the violent right even more?

              Your argument isn’t holding water.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                14 months ago

                My “argument” was “they totally could get shot outside the US.”

                Yes, gun control is not no guns.

                Seems you agree that it is possible to be shot outside the US. Your argument isn’t holding water.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  24 months ago

                  Its possible to be hit by a meteorite. We were talking risk, not possibility. At least I was. The chance of being shot for anyone in Australia is extremely low. The chance of being shot is high in America, relative to most other countries and all other developed countries. Its not even close.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    14 months ago

                    Tbf, the odds of getting shot in America are still pretty low too, it’s about 12k/350mil/yr, whatever the math is on that. It is possible though however unlikely, so maybe that answers your “targets on their back while touring aus blah blah gun control” question. Evidentially, it is indeed possible to be shotbin Australia.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      354 months ago

      He torpedoed their careers as a band.

      Did he though? I can’t imagine KG’s sentiment is an unusual one except among the MAGA cult and milquetoast centrists, and even then only the cultists could probably maintain a sustained boycott (although even then I don’t think things have been going too poorly for Bud Light lately).

      I’m not sure I buy the trump as martyr either. No one has quite been able to replicate his “charm” among the faithful, so with him gone are centrists going to be more swayed? I’m not convinced.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        This is precisely the problem.

        “Most progressives” do not think it works be OK to assassinate a political opponent, but that flippant “joke” makes it sound like a normal and reasonable position.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            34 months ago

            You’re correct of course, when the news broke my initial reaction was “this would be fucking great”, but it didn’t take long to realise that it wouldn’t have the desired effect.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          84 months ago

          You been off lemmy recently or something? Most clearly do support it. Every thread here there’s one or two pacifists decrying violence with downvotes and justification for murder in replies. Most people on lemmy are progressive, and I’d be willing to bet this isn’t the only progressive hangout that has been having the same experience.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            I don’t really follow you. Yes Lemmy is a progressive hangout. Opinions here are not indicative of the larger population, nor even the larger population of progressives.

            Basing an opinion of what “most” progressives want based on Lemmy comments is absolutely absurd.

            Regardless, I guess I’m one of those few pacifists who don’t think violence is the best course of action. Trump needs to be slaughtered in the election and then go to jail.

            It doesn’t take much insight to understand that Trump being assassinated would be the start of a dark period in history, not the end.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Tbf, by this logic, we can never say “most X Y” without having the actual data to back it up, and neither of us do, so stalemate I guess. All either of us have is empirical.

              I’m not arguing with your pacifism, I’m just arguing with the premise that most progressives aren’t literally saying “dammit why’d he miss” right now.