• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25 months ago

    Oh, what if the Riemann hypothesis is such a statement then? Or any other mathematical statement. We may not have any use for them now, but as with all things math, they are sometimes useful somewhere unexpected.

    • Kogasa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      It’s extremely unlikely given the pathological nature of all known unprovable statements. And those are useless, even to mathematicians.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        Math is also used to make a statement/model our universe. And we are still trying to find the theory to unify quantum mechanics and gravity. What if our math is simply inconsistent hence the theory of everything is not possible within the current mathematical framework?

        Sure when you are solving the problems it is useless to ponder about it, but it serves as a reminder to also search for other ideas and not outright dismiss any strange new concept for a mathematical system. Or more generally, any logical system that follows a set of axioms. Just look at the history of mathematics itself. How many years before people start to accept that yes imaginary numbers are a thing.

        • Kogasa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          Dunno what you’re trying to say. Yes, if ZFC is inconsistent it would be an issue, but in the unlikely event this is discovered, it would be overwhelmingly probable that a similar set of axioms could be used in a way which is transparent to the vast majority of mathematics. Incompleteness is more likely and less of an issue.