This stupid topic again

But sure

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      204 months ago

      Ideally, yeah, but think about the logistics of pulling something like that off. And would it be a full primary redo? Like fresh ballots sent out to all dems? Or do you mean a mini primary just with the existing delegates? Because we already voted in the Democratic primary election…

      I’m just really trying to be pragmatic about this, I can’t imagine a scenario where we pull this off and come out stronger. I would love to be wrong.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        124 months ago

        Saying a month is “plenty” of time to plan and run any kind of election on a national level is so ridiculously out-of-touch I read it back like five times thinking maybe it was sarcastic. Off the top of my head there’s booking polling places, securing & training staff, voting machines, ballots that need to make their way through the entire supply chain starting all the way back at pre-production. Mail in ballots alone usually go out like a month ahead of time to compensate for issues with the mail.

        At this point in time, there’s a higher probability of Superman flying around the world backwards to rewind time and correct the gunman’s aim to actually hit Trump at that rally than there is of the Democrats being able to successfully pull off a second primary in a month. And that’s not even to touch the “coming out stronger” piece of it, which again, no chance in hell that happens with the kind of chaos a second primary would cause.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          94 months ago

          People live in their fantasies, where national primary elections are just a cut and paste affair that takes two days to set up.

          • Bilb!
            link
            fedilink
            English
            54 months ago

            You know, they could be. But I agree right now they aren’t.

            Personally, I don’t think it matters in this case. It’s not like we had a robust primary from the Dems this time around.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Probly just the superdelegates choosing in secret, like they threaten too if they don’t like the public vote. If their going to only be Democratic when it’s convenient, they might as well as course correct. I am for replacing Biden, but if they are even talking about it now they best get a move on. Apathy is gaining ground every second they are not at the wheel.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          Probly just the superdelegates choosing in secret, like they threaten too if they don’t like the public vote.

          Feeling free yet?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        64 months ago

        If we used Ranked choice voting, then we could simply switch to the next in line. That is, if the democrats would grace us with a primary.

        Please sir, but a scrap of representative democracy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        If there is an actual primary, it will not be with actual voters, but amongst the named delegates (99% of whom are pledged to Biden and are obligated to vote for him of he is still in the race) and the superdelegates.

    • mozzOP
      link
      fedilink
      54 months ago

      plenty of time to run an actual primary

      Look at what a practical idea this is

      As with other things e.g. Bernie Sanders as the nominee, there actually is a sensible option here, which is running a contested convention… it is highly notable to me that a lot of the people offering such constructive criticism on this topic are so studiously avoiding those sensible strategies when they are trying to “help”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        44 months ago

        I dunno, there are actually quite a few sensible and practical ideas in this thread, your thread, btw. Your post has elicited a good discussion, why throw shade on the people earnestly participating? If you actually want a contested convention, this thread is nothing compared to some of the wild shit that would go down in that scenario.

        • mozzOP
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Because redoing the primary is an absurd idea

          And I am, probably to an excessive and embittered degree, made cynical by the amount of open propaganda in and out of the media which is attempting to put out bad ideas on purpose to hurt the Democrats and help the fascists

          And you’re not wrong. A contested convention would be a massive shit show which might doom the Democrats in the election irrevocably. But it might also produce a nominee with some kind of mandate, which would be nice. It would also be feasible to do, whereas holding another primary election would not.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        I’m not confident how this stuff works, because it’s dumb as hell, but any PAC can do whatever they want, as long as they don’t directly coordinate with the campaign. The Biden-Harris PAC can just use their money to support whoever the Democrats choose I believe. It doesn’t have to be spent supporting either of them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      34 months ago

      You’re right and I wish they would, but I have near zero faith in their willingnes, ability, and coordination.