• CO5MO ✨
    link
    fedilink
    1094 months ago

    Stop making race comments: the most impossible challenge for the GOP.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            74 months ago

            They are already claiming she shouldn’t be eligible because she has no children of her own, only step children. No guy ever has been told he should be ineligible for office over not having children.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              34 months ago

              she shouldn’t be eligible because she has no children of her own

              By that metric, Trump isn’t qualified because who wants a president that doesn’t have a dog?!?!

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              14 months ago

              There hasn’t been a president without children since the civil war. In fact, unless my Wikipediaing failed me, the last time there was a major party candidate without children was 1876 when Samuel J. Tilden lost to Ruthorford B. Hayes.

              I strongly suspect it would be a major issue for a male candidate to be childless. The requirements for a presidential candidate are extremely conservative. They have to be married. They have to have children. They have to be christian – even being Catholic rather than Protestant has been a major issue for a few, including JFK and to a certain extent Biden. They also have to be tall. Since the advent of TV in 1928, the shorter candidate has only won 6 times. The taller candidate has won 17 times.

              Yes, there’s a ton of sexism about Harris, but in this case a guy would probably be attacked if he were childless too.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          My entire adult life, it’s felt like Republicans are made in those Coca-Cola Freestyle machines where you can customize the flavor. The base flavor is always pro-big business, American imperialist, anti-women’s rights, anti-intellectual. But then there’s always an extra shot of flavor! Maybe it’s something common, like being especially anti-queer, or rare like McCain having just a little squirt of integrity.

          But sometimes it’s weird! With Sarah Palin it was aerial wolf gunning! There was some other guy who was against laws forbidding dog fighting, because he said that because human boxing was allowed, outlawing dogfighting would elevate dogs above humans. And then you’ve got the likes of MTG where you just take ALL the flavors and mix them together.

          So yeah, we can expect a steady stream of base flavor repellent Republican behavior, with notes of racism and sexism that will be familiar to anyone who was paying attention during the Obama administration or the Trump vs. Clinton campaign.