Every empire falls. Its collapse becomes inevitable once its rulers lose all sense of how absurd and abhorrent they have become
There is only one country in the world right now, in the midst of Israel’s slaughter in Gaza, where Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is guaranteed dozens of standing ovations from the vast majority of its elected representatives.
That country is not Israel, where he has been a hugely divisive figure for many years. It is the United States.
On Wednesday, Netanyahu was back-slapped, glad-handed, whooped and cheered as he slowly made his way - hailed at every step as a conquering hero - to the podium of the US Congress.
This was the same Netanyahu who has overseen during the past 10 months the slaughter - so far - of some 40,000 Palestinians, around half of them women and children. More than 21,000 other children are reported missing, most of them likely dead under rubble.
It was the same Netanyahu whose government is standing trial for committing what the ICJ, the world’s highest judicial body, has termed a “plausible genocide”.
And yet, there was just one visible protester in the congressional chamber. Rashida Tlaib, the only US legislator of Palestinian heritage, sat silently grasping a small black sign. On one side it said: “War criminal”. On the other: “Guilty of genocide.”
One person among hundreds mutely trying to point out that the emperor was naked.
Indeed, the optics were stark.
This looked less like a visit by a foreign leader than a decorated elder general being welcomed back to the Senate in ancient Rome, or a grey-haired British viceroy from India embraced in the motherland’s parliament, after brutally subduing the “barbarians” on the fringes of empire.
This was a scene familiar from history books: of imperial brutality and colonial savagery, recast by the seat of the imperium as valour, honour, civilisation. And it looked every bit as absurd, and abhorrent, as it does when we look back on what happened 200 or 2,000 years ago.
It’s sensationalist and highly biased. Much like the person who posted it here.
I’m no cheerleader for the United states. My family has suffered genocide at the hands of the United States. And still often live as second class citizens in their own homes. I’m no cheerleader for any large Nation or nationalized government as someone who is libertarian / anarchist.
It’s an op-ed and they are entitled to their opinions and critique. That doesn’t mean it has much substance or value beyond that. That’s not what anyone’s objecting to though. It’s the blatant, disingenuous agenda posting. Likely from someone not directly involved or impacted in any way by any of this. And certainly not constructive or conducive to actual debate.
Do you think he’ll reply to your points, which he asked for?
They just did. And it was as empty and as pointless as all of us would have suspected.
What part of it is biased?
Most political articles are opinion pieces.
Linkerbaan uses deflect.
Linkerban hurts itself
Everyone and everything has a bias. Even wood has a bias. But you never cease to be non surprising. That is an extremely on brand and unserious response from you.
You wrote an 3 paragraphs without addressing anything in the article. Resorting to pure 100% ad-hominems and projection.
Not surprising from Eldrich.
This isn’t high school language class.
You don’t get to assign essay work and then mark a person down when they post a more cogent response than you but fail to say what you want.
They’re winning and while I’ve not taken note of you before, your style is that of a troll - requiring others to do high effort tasks while you post low effort replies.
It shows poor faith and it’s very poor optics for you.
And there it is another comment without substance and anything relevant to the article. You’re winning so hard.
Just laying out your whole playbook, eh?