One million Blackwell GPUs would suck down an astonishing 1.875 gigawatts of power. For context, a typical nuclear power plant only produces 1 gigawatt of power.

Fossil fuel-burning plants, whether that’s natural gas, coal, or oil, produce even less. There’s no way to ramp up nuclear capacity in the time it will take to supply these millions of chips, so much, if not all, of that extra power demand is going to come from carbon-emitting sources.

  • kn0wmad1c
    link
    fedilink
    English
    294 months ago

    We should start celebrating efficiency. Let’s name a planet after the scientist who discovers how to power these cards using 60% less energy.

      • I Cast Fist
        link
        fedilink
        144 months ago

        I’m fully expecting AI bros to say AI will create a working room-temp superconductor design

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        Resistive heating is not the dominant energy loss mechanism in modern computing. Since the advent of field effect transistors, switching losses dominate. Room temperature super conductors could be relevant in power generation, distribution, and manuafacturing, but would not radically alter the power requirements for computing.

        I personally don’t think any possible room temperature super conductors would be economical to produce at a large enough scale to make a large difference in energy demands. Researchers have pretty thoroughly investigated the classes of materials that are easy to manufacture, which suggests a room temperature superconductor would be prohibitevely expensive to produce.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          The one last summer broke me. I have a healthy skepticism of any announcement, but that one seemed so credible I bought in.