@[email protected] to [email protected] • 4 months agoTrump says he has 'no choice' but to support electric vehicles because Elon Musk 'endorsed me very strongly'www.businessinsider.commessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up1799cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1799external-linkTrump says he has 'no choice' but to support electric vehicles because Elon Musk 'endorsed me very strongly'www.businessinsider.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 4 months agomessage-square117fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•4 months agoWhat the parent comment is saying is the implication is that without Elon’s money, he wouldn’t consider EVs. So same meaning.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•4 months agoSaying that he “has no choice” now doesn’t really sound like he’s the one in control of the decision. That’s definitely not the same thing.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•edit-24 months agoNo, he said the converse. “Opposite” would necessarily suggest a different outcome (i.e. Musk not beholden to Trump). (Haven’t had a logic course in literal decades, so maybe someone can correct me if I’m misremembering. I forget how to draw those logic square thingies…)
He actually said the opposite here.
What the parent comment is saying is the implication is that without Elon’s money, he wouldn’t consider EVs. So same meaning.
Saying that he “has no choice” now doesn’t really sound like he’s the one in control of the decision. That’s definitely not the same thing.
No, he said the converse.
“Opposite” would necessarily suggest a different outcome (i.e. Musk not beholden to Trump).
(Haven’t had a logic course in literal decades, so maybe someone can correct me if I’m misremembering. I forget how to draw those logic square thingies…)
You’re right, thanks.