• Altima NEO
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      In Portland, the biggest problem light rail has are assholes parking on the tracks.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        464 months ago

        Batteries are heavy and expensive. A wired power source is so much more efficient for rail it’s barely worth discussing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        124 months ago

        The best use of a battery on a train is a small one to handle junctions. You disconnect from the wire at the end of one set, go through the junction, and then reconnect at the other side. Saves a lot of ugly spaghetti wiring.

        Otherwise, no, just use wires.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          104 months ago

          You don’t even need that. Every electric train I know of has pickups on each car, and any break in the catenary or third rail is short enough that it can be bridged naturally by two cars, or sometimes even just one, if it has pickups at both ends.

      • Iron Lynx
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 months ago

        That would mean that instead of an engine, you’re lugging around a battery pack, which is just as heavy while giving you a fraction of the range of an engine. Not to forget that battery cells have only a finite lifespan.

        Meanwhile, OHLE gives you infinite range and room for major weight savings. Plus you can keep running the same power system for decades.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        Battery and hydrogen-powered trains exist, they’re mainly used on less frequented lines because it would be more expensive to electrify them.