The lawsuit claims that Dr. Kanokporn Tangsuan suffered a fatal allergic reaction after eating at a Disney Springs restaurant despite repeatedly informing the waiter of her severe allergy.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4023 months ago

    "Disney is calling for the lawsuit to be dismissed because her husband signed up for a one-month trial of the Disney+ streaming service years prior.

    The company says signing up for the trial requires users to arbitrate all disputes with the company."

    Some lawyers truly are scum.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        343 months ago

        So would this mean that Disney can no longer use their massive legal department to crush fair use of their IP? If someone signs up for Disney+, the arbitration agreement goes both ways.

        I would think a competent judge would just ask the Disney lawyer that question. Like, “do you want to be out of a job?”

        • Billiam
          link
          fedilink
          593 months ago

          No.

          You and Disney agree to arbitrate all your claims. Disney still retains the right to fuck you over to the full extent of the legal system.

          After all, corporations are people, and some people are more people than other people.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        783 months ago

        Very much nottheonion material. Something like

        ”Disney Legal Team Argues that Agreeing to the Terms & Conditions of Their Streaming Platform Releases The Company of Any and All Potential Liability in Shellfish Poisonings”

        • 🔍🦘🛎
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          “Signing up for a free trial of Disney+ means they can kill you, legally.”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            123 months ago

            ”Disney Legal Team Argues that Agreeing to the Terms & Conditions of Their Streaming Platform Releases The Company of Any and All Potential Liability in Political Assassination”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      423 months ago

      Some people/companies/etc. really take “you miss 100% of the shots you don’t take” too far.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      333 months ago

      I do hope whoever suggested that this is a legitimate cause to dismiss the case dies of an intestinal blockage caused by hemorrhoids. Just a thing I hope.

    • edric
      link
      fedilink
      293 months ago

      Arguing over health/death via a technicality is one of the lowest of lows.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        213 months ago

        This shouldn’t even be a technicality here. If this goes through and a TOS is universally binding to your life then the court system just died. Also they can put other ridiculous things in there like you owe them the subscription money in perpetuity even if you decide to uninstall the app. They’ll argue the consideration is there because you can re-install at any time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          53 months ago

          Just get your bullets inscribed with “by receiving this bullet you have agreed to our tos, by which all liability is to be decided by the shooter’s dog, who does not like you.” Then murder is legal.

    • nifty
      link
      fedilink
      33 months ago

      Don’t blame lawyers, blame the lawmakers. Heck, people and/or civil society is responsible for petitioning to lawmakers for stronger protections. Absurd amounts of money/lobbying has perverted the process, which is why a lot of these entities need to be taxed of out their power to have lobbying money.