• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s not “lucky” when there were 100 satisfied customers for every complaint.

    I’m opposed to waiting for a very clearly ready game to satisfy some nitpickers, especially when having the game in players’ hands massively accelerates the testing timeline. If you wanted it a year late and “polished”, you could have bought it a year later and had it “polished”, without punishing everyone else over your unrealistic expectations. And you’d save money on top of it.

    • warm
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      Crazy how people wanna gloss over issues just because they like something generally. I’ll never understand why people wouldn’t want a better product. Absolutely mental take too there at the end. Have a good one.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 months ago

        Most people didn’t have issues.

        Later is meaningful negative value, and again, the product you get on the same date is almost always better if a finished and reasonably polished game of that scope is released to the public and uses the public feedback to help improve bug detection.