• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        123 months ago

        “If you don’t agree with the extrajudicial execution of a person by an 18-year old dipshit, you’re a pedophile”

        Seriously, put some attempt in please. That is just fucking lazy

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Not what I said. The things I said were two different statements. Don’t come at me cause you’ve got small skeletons in your closet.

          That’s a joke.

          You’re right, what I meant was the guy deserves some sympathy because he’s dead. The guy does not deserve sympathy based on his previous actions, AND he tried to kill some kid.

          Kyle is objectively in the right here, but he shouldn’t have been where he was, doing what he was doing. Fuck Kyle. I’m not condoning him.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            23 months ago

            Not sure about downvotes. Probably the few pedos on here saddened their numbers are thinning out.

            You’re trying to claim ^ that doesn’t clearly imply that people who downvoted your comment were “probably pedos”?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                23 months ago

                I like forums. If you don’t, then don’t use them.

                Especially don’t use them if you don’t have the moxy to stand behind your own words. Word’s which you said. Which go like this:

                Not sure about downvotes. Probably the few pedos on here saddened their numbers are thinning out.

                You’re trying to walk back the thing you now realise was pretty silly to wrote down. So youre trying to ignore your bs while still replying something.

                You directly implied people who disagree with you are pedophiles. What an intellectual take.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  13 months ago

                  Yea you said that part already cause it’s what I said. By that logic if you are disagreeing that this isn’t worth the time to keep going back and forth about youre probably a pedophile.

                  I like forums too 🙂. I also realIze what I said was fucking weird and back tracked a bit. If you let this go, I’m sure your experience here will be ever so slightly less negative. There’s plenty of other things to be doing on Lemmy then arguing with someone who’s joke didn’t land for you specifically.

                  It would be entirely easier to call me a dick out loud, chuckle at how much better you are for thinking a different opinion and moving on.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    13 months ago

                    “Let this go”?

                    I don’t quite catch your meaning. You can just stop replying if you feel like it.

                    I’m just here pointing out you got buthurt over people disagreeing with you and started calling them pedos. Not too mature, is it?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        53 months ago

        Hey, Trump is both of those things too, per courts of law. You must be pretty broken up he survived the attempt, huh?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        33 months ago

        Whether the person he shot was a convicted or suspected felon is absolutely irrelevant, vigilante justice is no justice at all, not to mention that he had no way of knowing anything about the people he shot.

        That said, I absolutely believe all three were legitimate self-defense. The problem here isn’t that he shot people in self-defense, but that he was a minor in possession of a firearm. Anyone who enabled him to bring that firearm to Kenosha should be held responsible (if they haven’t already).

    • Tb0n3
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      So you admit he was fighting for his life?

        • Tb0n3
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          The other gun would disagree with the validity of that.

            • Tb0n3
              link
              fedilink
              English
              23 months ago

              Because it’s not against the law and had shit that he was doing there. You act like state borders are like national borders.

                • Tb0n3
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  33 months ago

                  Cleaning graffiti if I recall correctly. Cleaning up in general in a dangerous area subject to some riots.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    163 months ago

                    It’s astonishing to me that you are simultaneously capable of forming full sentences and not seeing how useless and dumb that sentence sounds.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    83 months ago

                    You recall very incorrectly and should probably look up what really happened before you so confidently make incorrect statements. Ask yourself why he had zero cleaning equipment and instead only brought a loaded rifle.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          Self-defense is a response to a threat from someone else, “putting yourself” into a situation doesn’t change that. If that were true, we’d be free to blame victims of other crimes (e.g. cyclists and pedestrians hit by cars) for putting themselves into dangerous situations. But that’s absolutely not the case, it’s not my fault if a car hits me while I’m legally riding/walking on the side of the road, nor is it my fault that someone attacks me because I’m holding a firearm.

          That said, Rittenhouse was a minor and AFAICT not legally allowed to possess a firearm in that situation. That is the problem here, and anyone who enabled him to bring a firearm to that situation should be held at least partially accountable. But his actions in the moment were self-defense.

        • Tb0n3
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          The court disagrees. Just because somewhere is dangerous, doesn’t mean you’re not allowed to be there. If you want to go somewhere dangerous and you do not want to be at more risk, you bring protection.

          Don’t fuck around if you don’t want to find out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        103 months ago

        HEY everyone, this guy ^^ was THERE THAT NIGHT! We should all RELY TO him with our detailed questions about the events that unfolded since he clearly knows and has witnessed the events and is therefore an unimpeachable source of objective truth on this subject!

        Why weren’t you in the trial, out of curiosity? I’d have thought they’d be after your testimony, you know, since you know all this stuff and are really smart. Just wondering…