@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 4 months agoA.I. groks 66%-76% faster with data augmentation strategies.arxiv.orgmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up116
arrow-up116external-linkA.I. groks 66%-76% faster with data augmentation strategies.arxiv.org@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•4 months ago It’s standard practice to take colloquial vocab and more narrowly define it for use within a scientific discipline. No. It’s not standard at all, especially when the goal is overtly misleading. Sometimes different disciplines will narrowly define the same word two different ways Maybe one or both disciplines is promoting bullshit.
No. It’s not standard at all, especially when the goal is overtly misleading.
Maybe one or both disciplines is promoting bullshit.
Did you have a question?
Yeah what ails you, stranger?