dantheclamman to Not The [email protected]English • 3 months agoKentucky State Fair removes ribbon-winning miniature after realizing it depicted a porn setnypost.commessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1580cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1580external-linkKentucky State Fair removes ribbon-winning miniature after realizing it depicted a porn setnypost.comdantheclamman to Not The [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square82fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoIts an actual 1:1 faithful recreation of a porn set. Cheek prints and stain included.
minus-squareFlying SquidlinkfedilinkEnglish5•3 months agoI’m aware of what it is. Because I’ve seen porn. Like I said, it’s an “if you know, you know” situation. If a kid sees this and knows what it is, that kid has seen porn. Otherwise, it’s just a room.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•3 months agoSomebody who knew didn’t like it and now people like you are filling up my inbox making a stink about it. Whats your problem? Other people aren’t allowed to be upset about things you like? Their feelings don’t matter?
minus-squareFlying SquidlinkfedilinkEnglish7•3 months agoThey’re allowed to be as upset as they like. People get upset about all sorts of silly things. That doesn’t mean they need to be catered to. And what do you mean your inbox?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•3 months agoSo you acknowledge their feelings but you wish them harm, got it.
minus-squareFlying SquidlinkfedilinkEnglish8•3 months agoWhat are you even talking about? People are offended by statues of Martin Luther King, Jr. Should we take them down because those people are upset?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•3 months agoTolerance for all except the intolerant. Porn sets aren’t a protected class but keep ypur hopes up for the year 2412
minus-squareFlying SquidlinkfedilinkEnglish5•3 months agoDude, you’re literally embodying a Simpsons episode which already came true.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-23 months agoI want you to think deeply about if all porn is inherently artistic or if porn depictions have a separate circuimstance. I made a comment earlier about how dressing a Naiad Statue up as a hooker changes the context of the artwork significantly.
Its an actual 1:1 faithful recreation of a porn set. Cheek prints and stain included.
I’m aware of what it is. Because I’ve seen porn. Like I said, it’s an “if you know, you know” situation. If a kid sees this and knows what it is, that kid has seen porn. Otherwise, it’s just a room.
Somebody who knew didn’t like it and now people like you are filling up my inbox making a stink about it.
Whats your problem? Other people aren’t allowed to be upset about things you like? Their feelings don’t matter?
They’re allowed to be as upset as they like. People get upset about all sorts of silly things. That doesn’t mean they need to be catered to.
And what do you mean your inbox?
So you acknowledge their feelings but you wish them harm, got it.
What are you even talking about?
People are offended by statues of Martin Luther King, Jr. Should we take them down because those people are upset?
Tolerance for all except the intolerant. Porn sets aren’t a protected class but keep ypur hopes up for the year 2412
Dude, you’re literally embodying a Simpsons episode which already came true.
I want you to think deeply about if all porn is inherently artistic or if porn depictions have a separate circuimstance.
I made a comment earlier about how dressing a Naiad Statue up as a hooker changes the context of the artwork significantly.