• go $fsck yourself
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33 months ago

    The facts are presented as neutral because they exist and are neutral.

    The moderator deleted messages to hide their negative response, including messages that broke no rules citing a non-existent rule for the reason. They found out that the mod logs are public after they were called out for misusing their moderator powers by deleting messages that broke no rules. Then immediately deleted their account and complained about it on mastodon, very clearly stating that their issue was that mod logs are public.

    If you think that those facts somehow change because of the context, then that’s on you. You’re just flat wrong.

    Also it’s “bury the lede” 🙂

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      83 months ago

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead_paragraph#Spelling

      lol

      You just can’t help being pedantic. They’re both correct.

      The moderator got tired of this platform because it enables people who feel they were slighted to critique their every move. Mod logs don’t have to be public. I think it’s fine to disagree with that as a moderator. Mod abuse has been caught for decades without it, none of your argument hinged on the public mod logs other than the mastadon post where he shared annoyance that you were bothering him with them. Moderators are free to moderate with the tools and platform they want. He resigned, so fucking what.

      He was snarky back at you. Big whoop.

      This is an insular 1st world problem you are experiencing. Stemming from a bruised ego. This guy is not manipulative or toxic. You’re overreacting.

      Looking through your comments you do plenty of “dishing it out”. But this is how you react when someone sarcastically replies to you then nukes the thread? You must have paper skin.