• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    211 months ago

    So you are saying it is about the same amount as the GM stock swap that had widespread support?

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      If you’re talking about the 2018 auto bailout, that ended up making the government money because they managed to emerge out from it and the government charged a little interest.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        011 months ago

        I am talking about the stock swap. You know the giant well over 10 billion dollar wealth transfer that was never paid back. You do know about this as you are talking about it, I trust.

        Also I am curious now, why does a car company make the US government money but not people with degrees?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          Why does a car company make the US government money but not people with degrees?

          They both do, and the people with degrees make even more money by paying interest on their crushing debt!

    • Buelldozer
      link
      fedilink
      -311 months ago

      The 2008 TARP that bailed out GM and Chrysler may have had widespread support but it wasn’t universal. In my opinion it shouldn’t have been done either and was probably only necessary because of the original Chrysler bailout back in the day. Without that “The Big Three” would have been subject to market forces and turned into “The Big Two”, the healthier market may have kept GM from being in the position to need a bailout.

      The other point of note is that GM did repay their loan so at least in that instance it worked out. I have no idea why anyone in the Federal Government thought that Yellow would be able to successfully repay this one.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        I specifically mentioned the stock swap not the loan. The swap was never paid back and was +10 billion range.

        Universally supported because everyone likes to forget about it.

        • Buelldozer
          link
          fedilink
          -311 months ago

          I had to look that up because honestly I had forgotten about it. It’s not that I “like” to, I just did.

          The argument that GM should have been required to make up the difference seems reasonable to me, of course I think the bailout was unreasonable in the first place sooooo…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            211 months ago

            But you knew it at one point. We all did. No one likes the idea that a private company was given well over 10 billion dollars, never paid it back, and the only reason they were given it was because they failed at the free market.

            No one wants to remember that they flew in on a private jet to Washington DC to beg for money. No one wants to remember that they were having problems for decades. No one wants to remember the blatant corruption of a Democratic party Congress with a Democratic party president awarding money to a solid blue state. No one wants to remember that they withheld evidence about their ignition locks and a women was falsy imprisoned for years for murder charges. No one wants to remember that they had since the 1970s oil crisis to adapt.

            All this stuff you read at one point or heard about on the radio or saw a program on TV or heard someone discussing it. A week from now you will forget it again. Because it was shitty and wrong and they got away with it. It is like a cognitive blindspot.