I know this is typical for the US so this is more for US people to respond to. I wouldn’t say that it is the best system for work, just wondering about the disconnect.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    251 year ago

    When would the teachers have time to lesson plan or grade if they’re teaching kids 8 hours a day?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      Just because students are at school from 9 to 5 doesn’t mean every single teacher has to be in front of a class from 9 to 5.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I mean, nationwide teacher shortage, overfilled classrooms… If the kids are there then all the teachers are working the whole time.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      While the kids are doing whatever they used to call homework in class. Split classes between teachers: one supervises while one works.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        So are you asking for twice as many teachers or twice as many kids per teacher?

        The struggle to hire teachers is already high and the GOP is trying to put as many obstacles as possible to slowly strangle public schools and shift to charter/private schools.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 year ago

          It’s literally what they do in my wife’s class where they have 24 each but hey what would I know

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -11 year ago

              Here is a functional solution you want to ignore because you look down on primary school teachers

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                “Functional” does not equal “practical”, nor does it even remotely equate to “looking down on primary school teachers”

                Let’s go ahead and ignore every other “functional solution” because it’s too (insert excuse) to work.

                What we’re currently doing in the US works so well, it’s why we lead the world in education… I think. Idk, I never learned any nuance besides standardized tests. But I’m ok, teachers and kids are just lazy

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  You might want to look up the educational standards for lower grades to HS.

                  It is better at the college level, though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      The same time they use now?.. in their free time. But like, still for free.

      Because they care so much, time/money means nothing to them. Otherwise, they shouldn’t be educators to begin with, because they obviously don’t care about the children. Who here is even thinking about the children?!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        People on the internet have gotten so stupid, I’m not entirely sure whether this was meant as /s or not. Really an indictment on the internet as a whole.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I feel that viscerally, so I wanted to confirm that I was being sarcastic. The, “Who here is even thinking about the children?!” was my attempt at /s without actually putting it. But I don’t blame you for having doubts lol