• pjhenry1216
    link
    fedilink
    -3
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Ugh. Dude. Are you literally programmed to ignore women as a source of information? You have more context. She implied he’d be upset if she told him that was her plan. Why do you disbelieve that? You’re literally creating extra information that isn’t there to question her narrative that she’s given you zero reason to not believe. Why is your default to simply not believe her?

    And buddy, if your judgement isn’t above questioning, you’re trying really hard to argue that it’s more legitimate than hers.

    Edit: so to summarize your point. Given a bunch of made up information, you disbelieve her, for no reason, other than the hypothetical you made up in your head. Got it. Totally normal way to respond to this. Not at all toxic or unhealthy in any way. You’re totally a positive influence on society.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      Ehhh, her last sentence kinda sounds like she didn’t want to make him sad by telling him she already knew all of this because he was so happy about sharing.

      • pjhenry1216
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        Honestly, I like that interpretation much much more. Just makes me realize how much seeing others take it so negatively even made me see it more negatively.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      None of that accurately describes my position. Please reread my posts. I have doubts you are giving a good faith effort.

      • pjhenry1216
        link
        fedilink
        -111 months ago

        I’m starting to doubt that you have actual capacity for comprehensive reasoning. That is absolutely a direct inference of your position. Just saying “no it’s not” doesn’t just make it so. All of that is true if one holds your position.