• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    the vast majority of plant matter fed to animals is waste product. they eat parts of plants that people can’t or won’t eat. so those plants are killed first for us, then the animals. and the point of the plant objection is not the amount of suffering, but the fact that no one cares if plants are killed, and only vegetarians and vegans care if animals are killed

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      This is wrong. Nearly all (source) of the soy the Amazonas gets destroyed for is animal feed. We give about one third of the global grain we produce to animals, we could end global hunger if we’d give it to humans. Plus we could reforest vast regions, so we don’t die, as a species. Go vegan please.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        you’re wrong. soy is a great example: about 85% of the global crop is pressed for soybean oil. the byproduct would be industrial waste if it weren’t fed to livestock

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Soy cake can be used to produce textured vegetable protein (meat alternatives), tofu, tempeh, soy milk, protein powder, biofuels and bioplastics, for example.

          Calling that industrial waste is just a complete joke.

          The land could also be used to grow other crops for human consumption.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            13 months ago

            Soy cake can be used to produce textured vegetable protein

            but most people don’t want to eat it. you enumerated many of the uses it has been put to, but the fact is that we produce far more soy cake than is used in those other industries, and feeding it to animals is a good use for it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            13 months ago

            The land could also be used to grow other crops for human consumption.

            to be clear, the land is already being used to grow crops for human consumption.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        there is no reason to believe deforested areas would not become further developed if agriculture becomes untenable