• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    219 days ago

    That sounds so futuristic.

    As it’s NASA is it using technology decades more advanced than the competition?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      218 days ago

      Are you joking? Well the answer is no, no the SLS is about 40 years behind as far as technology goes. It’s basically a shuttle derived launch vehicle, the boosters are similar to the shuttle side boosters and it uses 4 slightly updated RS-25s (the space shuttle main engines) in the center stage.

      Except instead of getting with the times and attempting some reusability, it actually has less reusability than the shuttle had. They actually throw away all of those expensive high performance hydrolox engines on every launch.

    • Diplomjodler
      link
      fedilink
      English
      218 days ago

      Oh definitely. And an absolute steal at just 2.5 billion a pop.