• Flying SquidM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 months ago

    Again- this was about you claiming China is not expansionist.

    You can claim the expansionism was justified, you can claim that the people wanted it, you can claim it’s unfair because of “the imperialists,” you can claim any of those things or other things.

    What you cannot truthfully claim is that a country which literally expanded its borders by a massive amount in living memory by the same government that is currently in power is not expansionist.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      A people’s liberation event in 50 years is really all you pro-US-imperialists have to point to as for how evil and militaristic china is. You guys are laughable.

      • Flying SquidM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 months ago

        Please do not make personal attacks like that. They violate community rules (rule 5) and you have no idea what my politics are. I am just challenging your claim that China is not expansionist by showing that they literally expanded their borders by a massive amount within living memory.

        I’m sorry facts anger you, but they’re still facts even if they disagree with your political worldview.

          • Flying SquidM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            92 months ago

            Was China bigger or smaller after taking over Tibet? I think you know the answer is bigger.

            Making your country bigger would be doing what with it? I think you know the answer is expanding it.

            And I doubt I’m making you laugh or you wouldn’t be making personal attacks.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              You’re just showing you don’t understand basic concepts. You called China’s liberation of Tibet “colonialism”, proving you don’t know the meaning of it. Expansionism isn’t “when borders grow at any time in history”, it’s a tendency of a nation to view its territorial expansion as a desirable goal for the sake of it or for access to resource for example. Austria building an embassy in Tibet would grow Austria’s borders, technically counting as expansionism according to you. You have lib level of politics knowledge and analysis, and it’s hysterical how you try to bend definitions to make things look good for US imperialism

              • Flying SquidM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                82 months ago

                So Tibet wasn’t a desirable goal and didn’t give China access to resources? They just did it out of pure altruism?

                  • Flying SquidM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    82 months ago

                    The U.S. stopped expanding its borders with various Pacific islands in the 1940s. I assume you still consider them expansionist.