• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      43 months ago

      I do think RCV would be a better system than what we have now, but I have very little confidence that it could ever be implemented without some loopholes that would essentially undermine it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 months ago

        Do you think Australia/Ireland have those loopholes too, or is there something else we need to fix first before it’ll work here?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            33 months ago

            And Schulze is even better than that, but we’re never going to get anything better than FPTP if we can’t coordinate on a first step.

            Heck, I feel a little dirty inside calling IRV by “RCV” to appeal to the general public.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              13 months ago

              I do have that concern but based on how RCV has worked in some real elections my concerns with it a major enough that it might be worth it to advocate for a different system. I don’t want electoral reforms as a whole to go down because of imperfections with RCV.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                4
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                I mean gotta coalesce around something cause right now debating before the door is even opened is seriously killing momentum.

                Edit: Think back to occupy. People defeating each other before the real battle even starts is a guaranteed way to lose.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          33 months ago

          I’m not familiar with how elections work in those countries, but from what I do hear, Aussie politics is pretty rightwing.