Social media platforms like Twitter and Reddit are increasingly infested with bots and fake accounts, leading to significant manipulation of public discourse. These bots don’t just annoy users—they skew visibility through vote manipulation. Fake accounts and automated scripts systematically downvote posts opposing certain viewpoints, distorting the content that surfaces and amplifying specific agendas.

Before coming to Lemmy, I was systematically downvoted by bots on Reddit for completely normal comments that were relatively neutral and not controversial​ at all. Seemed to be no pattern in it… One time I commented that my favorite game was WoW, down voted -15 for no apparent reason.

For example, a bot on Twitter using an API call to GPT-4o ran out of funding and started posting their prompts and system information publicly.

https://www.dailydot.com/debug/chatgpt-bot-x-russian-campaign-meme/

Example shown here

Bots like these are probably in the tens or hundreds of thousands. They did a huge ban wave of bots on Reddit, and some major top level subreddits were quiet for days because of it. Unbelievable…

How do we even fix this issue or prevent it from affecting Lemmy??

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    303 months ago

    Add a requirement that every comment must perform a small CPU-costly proof-of-work. It’s a negligible impact for an individual user, but a significant impact for a hosted bot creating a lot of comments.

    Even better if you make the PoW performing some bitcoin hashes, because it can then benefit the Lemmy instance owner which can offset server costs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      313 months ago

      Will that ruin my phone’s battery?

      Also what if I’m someone poor using an extremely basic smartphone to connect to the internet?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 months ago

      That’s a hard NO from me, dawg. If Lemmy goes down that path, I will just not comment. My account settings let me just block bots. I dont need my resources wasted so I can interact with the “good bots”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          That’s not what I consider negligible on my phone, which is already resource constrained. Yes, I have a problem with an app that intentionally wastes my valuable resources. I wouldn’t care so much from my desktop, but I mostly just use a desktop client to do things I can’t easily do on my mobile clients.

          No big deal. It’s not as if my participation is especially valuable. I would just participate less.

          edit: my objection is obviously more in principal than it is practical, but it would hardly be the first time I walked away from software (or a network) on philosophical grounds.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            63 months ago

            If we can’t find a more practical solution, then is it really a “waste” of resources? Right now we’re paying with much more expensive time and attention.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          that was pretty fast. i think if I was a bot sending prompts to an AI to generate posts, i probably wouldn’t care about this amount of computation at all

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            33 months ago

            Must be strange to live in a world where you can’t imagine that software could have configurable parameters, such that you could find something that’s fine for a person posting individual comments and painful for a bot farm.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              33 months ago

              15 seconds to generate a post from the prompt with ai, and 1/15 seconds for the hashcash challenge is supposed to inconvenience the bot wizards?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                33 months ago

                If they’re running their own LLM hardware, and their Lemmy spam posts are generating enough revenue to cover that, then I take it back, because that is impressive.

                I guess we’re fucked.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  13 months ago

                  It’s not always about profit, it’s also about controlling the narrative. The more expensive that is, the less the narrative can be controlled by money.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      83 months ago

      At that point aren’t we basically just charging people money to post? I don’t want to pay to post.

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          53 months ago

          shitposters are the bed rock of any healthy online community

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          But that opens up a whole can of worms!

          • Will we use Hashcash? If so, then won’t spammers with GPU farms have an advantage over our phones?

          • Will we use a cryptocurrency? If so, then which one? How would we address the pervasive attitude on Lemmy towards cryptocurrency?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      How would this be enforceable, though? Part of the benefit of the Fediverse is that multiple different apps can communicate with each other (for example, you can see Lemmy posts on Mastodon). Even if Lemmy implements something like this, what’s to stop someone from commenting using a different app that doesn’t implement it?

      I’m actually surprised we don’t see more spam on ActivityPub-powered systems, since spammers don’t even need to have an account with Lemmy, Mastodon, etc and could instead have their own ActivityPub server to send the spam. I guess they don’t do that since the spam instance would be defederated pretty quickly.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          63 months ago

          It doesn’t seem like a no brainer to me… In order to generate the spam AI comments in the first place, they have to use expensive compute to run the LLM.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          63 months ago

          what happens when the admin gets greedy and increases the amount of work that my shitty android phone is doing

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            Technically not, but spammers can already pay to outsource hashing more easily than desirable users can. So if we’re relying on hashes anyways, then we might as well make it easy for desirable users to outsource too.

            IMO that’s why the inventor of Hashcash just develops Bitcoin today.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I think the computation required to process the prompt they are processing is already comparable to a hashcash challenge

      • @TheKMAP
        link
        English
        13 months ago

        But that’s on the LLM side not the bot side.