• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    602 months ago

    Just FYI, this wasn’t clips of porn. This was actual movies with nude scenes.

    Still not entirely sure how I feel about it, but I do agree it’s not the same thing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 months ago

        Part of the (US) definition of fair use is the impact of the use on the original party. Killing their viewership with a review is still fair use because it’s balanced with the public’s right to a review, but I think there’s a legitimate argument that turning their movie into nothing but a sex object, especially systematically like that, does harm that’s not protected.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      242 months ago

      Why do you not know how to feel about it?

      To me it’s just clip collection, you could have a collection of all death scenes or car cashes. They’re all just clips from videos people agreed to make for public consumption.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Because in basically any other scenario it’s obvious sexual harassment, and behavior like that is a big part of the reason a lot of actresses aren’t comfortable doing a role where they’re nude to begin with.

        It’s not porn stars who signed up for that content being made into a highlight. It’s an actress who agreed to do a specific scene as part of a movie being treated like they’re doing porn.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      Just FYI, this wasn’t clips of porn. This was actual movies with nude scenes.

      Why does that matter? To a horny enough 14 year old there is no difference.