The songs that the AI CEO provided to Smith originally had file names full of randomized numbers and letters such as “n_7a2b2d74-1621-4385-895d-b1e4af78d860.mp3,” the DOJ noted in its detailed press release.

When uploading them to streaming platforms, including Amazon Music, Apple Music, Spotify, and YouTube Music, the man would then change the songs’ names to words like “Zygotes,” “Zygotic,” and “Zyme Bedewing,” whatever that is.

The artist naming convention also followed a somewhat similar pattern, with names ranging from the normal-sounding “Calvin Mann” to head-scratchers like “Calorie Event,” “Calms Scorching,” and “Calypso Xored.”

To manufacture streams for these fake songs, Smith allegedly used bots that stream the songs billions of times without any real person listening. As with similar schemes, the bots’ meaningless streams were ultimately converted to royalty paychecks for the people behind them.

  • magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    3054 months ago

    Fuck it. This scam was clever enough that I appreciate and sorta admire it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        274 months ago

        The solution, to me, would seem to be to divide the revenue up on an individual basis instead. Does some sort of licensing issue prevent this? I’d think that the legitimate record labels would want to fix this loophole ASAP so that they can get more money.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            234 months ago

            exceot for the fact that it MASSIVELY inflates their stats for investors and advertisers.

            Ah yes, the Reddit strategy.

            • @person420
              link
              English
              14 months ago

              Google has been doing it with YouTube for as long as there has been a paid version of it. If you’re a premium subscriber, the creators you watch get a portion of your subscription based on how much you watch them. It’s why premium subscriber views are worth more than free views.

              That’s why IMO YouTube premium is worth it. My subscription supports the creators I watch and I get no ads.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        144 months ago

        Fuck Spotify, they can eat a bag of dicks after renewing Joe cum-guzzling Rogan for $200million. They deserve to have all of their money stolen.

      • magnetosphere
        link
        fedilink
        54 months ago

        I didn’t realize it was a thing. Thanks for taking the time to explain!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 months ago

        It seems like it would be super easy for them to close this loophole. If you use the model that free tier listeners (real ones) will listen to about the same distribution of songs as the paying listeners, then just stop counting all free tier listeners and multiply the amount paid out for the pay-tier listeners by an appropriate factor to make payouts the same as before.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      234 months ago

      Y’know this guy seems intelligent enough to come up with this scheme, but not intelligent enough to keep a low profile. I honestly don’t understand that.

      Personally, I’d do the math to pay myself a living wage with this so that my actual work salary is nothing but a cherry on top; manage it so it seems like hype is ebbing and flowing in a natural way. If you ever figure out a way to break the system like this, you should never act in a way that draws attention to yourself.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        284 months ago

        I imagine quite a few folks have done this. You don’t hear about everyone that got away with it but you definitely hear about those that get caught.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        94 months ago

        It’s like the person who figured out the free gas card hack and let her friends use it. If she’d kept it herself, she’d still get free gas.

        • @person420
          link
          English
          24 months ago

          Just like in this case, it isn’t straight forward. She wasn’t simply “letting her friends use it”, she was selling use of the trick.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        If you ever figure out a way to break the system like this, you should never act in a way that draws attention to yourself.

        There was a guy who robbed banks and he wasn’t caught for decades because he just lived an ordinary working-class lifestyle. Cheap little apartment, no fancy car etc. etc.

      • Tarquinn2049
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        Once you have to put that amount of effort and attention in for a reasonable income… you are just doing a job… a job no-one benefits from. So it won’t be satisfying to do. No longer beating the system, just beating yourself.

    • Lord Wiggle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      194 months ago

      I thought the same, but it’s at the cost of real artists who are struggling to survive in a harsh market, so it still hurts. Sadly, this man isn’t unique. There are many Spotify listening farms listening to fake artists with AI generated songs just over 30sec which is the minimal listening requirement to get payed. And Spotify does nothing, as they get more money too.

      I can appreciate a well performed scheme or crime, but only if it steals from the rich and big corps. In this case, it steals from honest artists who give us amazing music while mostly being under paid on a regular basis, with the exception here and there.

      Stealing from the poor is really low. Only the biggest assholes are capable of doing that. (looks at all the billionaires)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        74 months ago

        I think you’re confused about who got hurt by the scheme. Billion dollar streaming platforms fucking over artists don’t need to be defended.

        • Lord Wiggle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          54 months ago

          If you read my comment again, you can see I noted that Spotify is in on it. They profit too from these schemes. All those bots listening to 30sec AI songs playlists are running on Spotify premium accounts so Spotify won’t do anything to fight fraud. They take 30%.

          I never defended any platform, I only defended the artists. So I guess the confused one is you, my friend.

      • magnetosphere
        link
        fedilink
        44 months ago

        Ah. I thought this was an isolated incident. I understand, and agree with, your point.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        When I first read your comment about this scheme keeping money from artists I was skeptical. But, yup! It is right there on Spotify’s website:

        We distribute the net revenue from Premium subscription fees and ads to rightsholders.

        Now, granted a bunch of those “rightsholders” are likely big corporate record labels but your point stands. The little guy is getting screwed, too.

        Though, adding to your final thought, I bet if it was only the little guy getting screwed and not the corpos I bet DOJ wouldn’t have cared.

        • Lord Wiggle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          See this video for more info about these scams and how Spotify is enabling them and protects them.