I think a little clarification is needed. No. I don’t actually think everyone there is insane. I don’t care about the bans so stop trying to use that. HB enthusiasts coming here and trying to call me out achieves nothing besides proving my point

Edit: Feel free to keep trying to brigade me. It’s not going to scare me to take this down

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    43 months ago

    All the computational resources the users tested the code base on must’ve been free.

    fair enough I just think of direct monetary donations or something when I see financing like that but looking at like that isn’t incorrect

    Identity politics from .ml?

    I mean kinda? I normally expect people who hold sympathies towards hexbear to use an account on like lemm.ee so they don’t have to use more than one account to browse everything they want to see

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      when I see financing like that but looking at like that isn’t incorrect

      None of the devs got paid. There are no other expenses.

      I normally expect people who hold sympathies towards hexbear to use an account on like lemm.ee so they don’t have to use more than one account to browse everything they want to see

      You expect the convenient implementation of MLK’s white moderate. But, my content should give no indication of that stereotype.

      I’ll answer your previous question: I’ve personal accounts on world, ee, ml, and hexbear. The fediverse doesn’t limit viewing content from multiple accounts concurrently. One must only choose an account to post. The only obstacle to such a tool is a means to avoid burdening the fediverse with duplicate responses to content requests. We solved that problem in a few hours.

      If you want actual insight communicated properly then you should ask in the correct venue. For example, I’d have no issue explaining in nuance on hexbear because the majority has a strong understanding or conversion of theory to praxis. I’m not even needed. Others would adequately explain on my behalf.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I think my comments have been too ambiguous then, I didn’t mean for anything I’ve said to come across as hostile in any way, I apologize. I’m a lemmygrad user, made this account because I browse through .ml at work and been meaning to make one so i can comment while there.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          73 months ago

          I’ve perceived only good faith from your posts. I apologize if I’ve not demonstrated that in my responses. It’s difficult to do here.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              32 months ago

              Based on this interaction I’ve realized my perception of lemmygrad is hypocritical: My experience indicates that our shallow, automated and wide scope language analysis likely isn’t human truth. I’ve decided to spend more time there.

              Thank you for risking good faith engagement when it’s not popular or politic. Iron sharpens iron.