@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 11 months agoFailed replication of claimed superconductor reported on arxivarxiv.orgmessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up1173cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1173external-linkFailed replication of claimed superconductor reported on arxivarxiv.org@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 11 months agomessage-square79fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•11 months agoI imagine they only have a few grams of the stuff. And they’re not highly motivated to be debunked immediately
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•11 months agobut if it were real, they were claiming it could be manufactured easily, so making some samples to send out to research labs would not be too difficult
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•11 months agoRight. And they haven’t. Now what may we deduce about their confidence in these results?
I imagine they only have a few grams of the stuff. And they’re not highly motivated to be debunked immediately
but if it were real, they were claiming it could be manufactured easily, so making some samples to send out to research labs would not be too difficult
Right. And they haven’t. Now what may we deduce about their confidence in these results?